Dell wireless 1560 802.11ac.Dell XPS 13-9343 Touchscreen Ultrabook Review

Dell wireless 1560 802.11ac

Couldn't find what you're looking for? Log in / Sign up to ask a question now.Dell Wireless ac - Dell Community

Feb 06,  · Communication The XPS 13 ships with but one option for wireless networking: the Dell Wireless adapter, which is an ac dual-band 2x2 Author: Steve Schardein. Feb 26,  · I have a brand new Dell XPS I dual boot it with Windows and Ubuntu The Wireless Network Adapter is Broadcom BCM ac with PCID [14eb1] (rev 03). The is not included in the list for installation via bcmwl-kernal-source file. I tried this anyway, but the Terminal command led to the file starting to install, but then. Mbps USB Wireless WiFi Adapter for PC, USB Wi-Fi Dongle AC Mini Network Adapters ac GHz/5GHz Built-in Antenna for Windows 10/7/8//XP Mac OS 5/5(7).

Dell wireless 1560 802.11ac.Dell XPS Touchscreen Ultrabook Review - Reviews

Dell Wireless DW M.2 Form Factor Card. This card combines ac WLAN and BT +HS (Bluetooth) onto one card. Oct 15,  · This package provides Dell Wireless A ac Driver and is supported on XPS and Precision running the following Operating Systems: Windows Get the latest driver Please enter your product details to view the latest driver information for your system. Mbps USB Wireless WiFi Adapter for PC, USB Wi-Fi Dongle AC Mini Network Adapters ac GHz/5GHz Built-in Antenna for Windows 10/7/8//XP Mac OS 5/5(7).

related: Dell Wireless 1550 - network adapter Specs & Prices Connectivity Dell Wireless - network adapter Specs & Prices - CNET Subscribe to RSS Dell OEM Wireless DW WLAN WiFi Wireless Card 6XRYC

Today, that product is the Dell XPS an Ultrabook that not only looks absolutely stunning, but which is also clearly designed with the most deliberate attention to practicality and functionality. It is, in fact, smaller and lighter than the MacBook Air , has a far superior screen with touch optional , and Dell claims that it can provide better battery runtimes, too—all without sacrificing performance.

Much like the aforementioned MacBook, everything about the XPS screams quality and deliberation. But can it live up to its promises across the board? With math and science as our witnesses, we hereby begin our evaluation of a truly beautiful, and equally ambitious, specimen. For starters, this is one truly beautiful machine.

Function and form coexist harmoniously via smart selection of construction materials and intelligent implementation of all the subtle necessities. Aesthetically, the rounded edges have been traded for sharper-pointed corners, and we think it looks great.

This is primarily due to the first of the notable functional changes: the fact that the carbon fiber bottom has now been traded for single piece of curved aluminum to match the lid. This provides greater rigidity and resistance to twisting and flex , not to mention a lack of the subtle popping sound which could be provoked of the previous design with a bit of pressure. Meanwhile, the display lid also seems more rigid than before , sporting excellent torsion resistance and very good protection against rear pressure.

The base is still wedge-shaped, featuring a slight incline going from front to back which provides for comfortable typing. The bottom of the unit still features the same silver XPS nameplate covering all of the component labels, and the two large rubber feet still span the width of the unit to hold the base firmly in place on a surface. Finally, the hinges keep the display lid stationary even during heavier typing and tapping—actions which normally spell trouble in the way of dancing reflections when it comes to most glossy-screened Ultrabooks.

All the bases are covered; honestly, there is no room for substantive criticism. Of course, not everyone is given to opening and maintaining their PCs, but those who are and do pick up a Torx driver will be pleased with the rest of the story: once the cover carefully snaps off, components are easily accessible within. It is worth mention that, as is often the case with such ultra-compact units, the RAM is soldered to the board and thus not replaceable. One final nitpick: the notebook cannot be opened with a single finger; due to the strength of the hinges, one has to hold down on the base unit while lifting the screen or else the entire unit lifts off the surface.

With slimmer form factors comes less edge real estate—and thus inevitable sacrifice in the realm of port selection. Two USB 3. On a final note, the addition of an SD card reader is a nice bonus that nearly everyone can appreciate. All of the ports conveniently line the sides of the unit, preventing the need to reach around to the back to plug something in.

The XPS 13 ships with but one option for wireless networking: the Dell Wireless adapter, which is an This adapter also includes Bluetooth 4. And best of all, it does not require any sort of external power to operate —only that which is provided via the USB 3. This makes it incredibly handy for business professionals in a pinch who simply need the convenience of greater port variety. The next accessory we received is essentially a combination power splitter and portable battery pack , enabling the user to charge both a laptop and up to two additional devices via USB e.

The kicker is the built-in mAh 4 cell, 43 Wh battery —which allows the adapter to provide a charge even when unplugged. Portable battery packs are nothing new; the real benefit here is for owners of Dell laptops: not only do you get the usual USB ports to charge your plethora of compatible devices, but you also receive two cords one with each size Dell charging tip to connect to a wide range of lower-voltage Dell notebooks.

Again, as with the DA and the standard AC adapter, the build quality is good, styling is consistent, and the design is thoughtful. The unit weighs grams. This final accessory that came bundled with our unit is a custom-fit carry case for the new XPS A row of magnets snaps the flap shut effortlessly in a design which almost resembles some of the Lenovo ThinkPad Ultrabook fare.

Upgrades to longer coverage terms are available, as well as Accidental Damage Protection. The keyboard on the XPS 13 is completely different from that of the previous models.

Fortunately, while key travel is notably shorter, the overall typing experience is actually better. Feedback is very good, with a crisp stop and audible but not annoying click accompanying each keystroke.

Actuation force is quite low, making the typing experience effortless but palpable. We experienced reasonably accurate typing without much of a transitional period , and our speeds were above average. The keys feel tight and their surfaces are smooth and comfortable; our only complaint is that they attract and retain grease very easily, and it remains visible on the most frequently used keys until vigorously cleaned such as the space bar.

The layout is good. The function key row can be locked to the secondary functions, essentially requiring the Fn key combination for F keys and allowing the hardware control toggles to serve as defaults. Key sizes are mostly standard, with only the far left and right vertical columns seeing some shrinkage—and nothing catastrophic or truly disruptive, either.

The keyboard is also backlit , featuring three levels of brightness in addition to off. When compared to previous XPS 13 models, typing requires less effort and feels somewhat more comfortable as a result. The lack of travel is the only sticking point, but after a bit of adjustment it proves unproblematic. The touchpad also functions well.

The matte surface finish is smooth and encourages effortless finger gliding, whereas the integrated buttons, however controversial they remain, gave us no trouble throughout our testing. Multitouch gestures and scrolling were also handled well. Upon first impressions, brightness, contrast, and color reproduction all appear to be excellent. The only slight negative is the incidence of an ever-so-slight flashlighting effect at the bottom-left quadrant of the screen near the bezel.

Not only is the panel itself beautiful, but with the lack of surrounding material, there is nothing to distract from its brilliance.

It somewhat appears to be floating above the base unit—a unique but welcomed and beneficial, too, in terms of compactness property which we hope will become more commonplace on future Ultrabooks. On to our measurements. Meanwhile, our contrast measurements produced a magnificent result of , thanks to a low black value of just 0.

This is only barely noticeable in practice however. It is worth mentioning that some users are reporting an inability to disable what appears to be built-in panel power savings measures which reduce contrast and brightness slightly when darker screen elements are introduced.

In our testing, we were able to provoke this, but it was hardly bothersome in our opinion and indeed quite difficult to detect under normal circumstances. Displaying a completely black screen and then immediately switching to a white background produces the conditions where this may be noticeable. Still, regardless of the subjective insignificance of this issue, it would be nice to have an option to disable this behavior.

We measured an average ColorChecker DeltaE of 5. Meanwhile, a total gamma of 2. Outdoors , the panel struggles in the sunlight as all glossy screens do.

Finally, viewing angles are nearly perfect barring the incidence of reflections, thanks to the IPS technology. To check performance while running unplugged , we performed a subsequent run of 3DMark 06 and found no significant difference in the results a score of We should expect based on preliminary evaluation to see performance from the iU similar to that of the iU. Our actual results were fairly close.

Similarly, in Super Pi 32M , we recorded seconds , whereas the iU median is What about multi-core performance? Here, the discrepancy drops to just 0. In Cinebench R15 multi-core bit , we recorded points , while the median for the iU is points. The same is true in Cinebench R These scores are all close enough that none of them truly communicates any significant difference in speed between the three units in terms of overall everyday performance.

Sure enough, as our benchmarks show, performance has climbed a notch , though naturally the XPS 13 is not meant to be a GPU powerhouse. While idle , the XPS 13 is practically silent under all circumstances; we measured just Under load , the machine is still normally pretty quiet—that is, until you reach the very highest levels of stress, where eventually it can reach 48 dB A which is quite loud.

This is rare , however, and it seems that the machine does a good job of remaining within near-silent or at least tolerable noise levels during most every scenario.

A quick note about the CPU coil whine which some users complained about on previous XPS 13 models: in a completely silent room, we placed our ear directly to the keyboard and listened while we stressed the CPU. On the left side of the keyboard under these circumstances, it is possible to hear a faint electrical noise which could be classified as coil whine. However, four to five inches above the keyboard it becomes impossible to detect, and at the distance one normally sits from the screen this would never be noticed at all.

What remains is considerably fainter than was reported by some users on previous models, and the result is that, when the cooling fan is off, the XPS is practically silent.

As early owners of the machine will also testify, the problem has been solved. In terms of thermal management, the XPS is a real winner. The notebook draws in air through a large cutout on the bottom and exhausts it through a vent in the hinge.

And it works; even under the highest levels of stress , we measured just During idle operation, temperature readings plummet to an average of This is thermal management done right. Meanwhile, GPU stress is a somewhat different story. Here, the clock rate initially peaks at its MHz maximum, but it subsequently quickly drops to the somewhat lower MHz — MHz range. Meanwhile, the bottom of the machine is warmer but still comfortable to the touch.

This is a better location which yields both clearer audio and better stereo separation. The same holds true here. The sounds retains a good amount of clarity also throughout it all.

Overall, the audio is very good for such a small notebook. The XPS 13 features a rather large 52 Wh internal battery that consumes roughly half of the internal real estate of the notebook. Couple that with the efficient 15 W TDP Broadwell chipset and we should see some pretty inspiring numbers.

On the flip side, the Classic Test minimum runtime; High Performance profile, wireless on, brightness maximum produced a result of 2 hours and 20 minutes —not bad. The result here was an excellent 9 hours and 40 minutes —nearly two hours longer than the previous XPS 13 and over an hour longer than both the MacBook Air 13 and Microsoft Surface Pro 3 It might not be worth sacrificing touch for many consumers in this case, but assuming the rest of the attributes are at least comparable between the screens, that means we should be able to expect that model to achieve runtimes of over 13 hours under these same settings—which is remarkable.